Clinical Health Psychologists' Role in the COVID-19 Response in Veteran and Military Hospitals

The COVID-19 international crisis has challenged us all in health care systems around the world. But, in military and veteran health care system, it may appear that the challenges are far greater. For example, military health care providers and soldiers have additional responsibility of deploying to defend the nation. Even, when soldiers are not at war, the day-to-day routine involves long hours, coupled with stressful field training exercise. In addition, military personnel typically relocate or move very three to four years from one duty assignment to another. In this chapter, suggestions are made for future research and clinical applications as part of a response to the COVID-19 challenges in the unique military and veteran health clinics. The need to improve treatment engagement and support for health care workers in military and veteran hospitals are provided. © The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2022.

Telehealth Applications in Military and Veteran Healthcare Settings

COVID-19 has brought increasing health care challenges upon providers throughout the country, let alone military healthcare professionals. Behavioral telehealth applications in the United States date back to the 1950s in Nebraska rural state-run mental health hospitals and clinics. Drs James and Folen developed innovative behavioral telehealth in the mid-to-late-1990s since there was a paucity of behavioral telehealth clinical applications and research from the 1960s to the early 1990s. Then, the need to deliver behavioral health services via telehealth platforms became of critical importance as our military and veteran hospitals needed to offer services in response to the COVID-19 health crisis. In this chapter, the authors will define behavioral telehealth and provide the reader with examples of clinical and research applications as well as discuss potential ethical and practical challenges. © The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2022.

Kindness in shared trauma during times of crisis: breaking the barriers of resilience among faculty and students

In the spring semester of 2020, at the peak of campus closures, more than 1,300 universities in the United States shifted from a traditional campus environment to an online delivery system or canceled classes entirely for the rest of the term (Smalley, [15]). A shared trauma with college faculty and student experiences During the height of the COVID-19 pandemic, faculty and students experienced a shared trauma, also known as a shared traumatic reality. As a first inclination, kindness toward the students contagiously led to kindness toward each other in university interactions among fellow faculty, colleagues, leadership, and staff roles. [Extracted from the article] Copyright of Communication Education is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full . (Copyright applies to all s.)

Updated Guidance Regarding The Risk ofAllergic Reactions to COVID-19 Vaccines and Recommended Evaluation and Management: A GRADE Assessment, and International Consensus Approach.

This guidance updates 2021 GRADE recomendations regarding immediate allergic reactions following COVID-19 vaccines and addresses re-vaccinating individuals with 1st dose allergic reactions and allergy testing to determine re-vaccination outcomes. Recent meta-analyses assessed the incidence of severe allergic reactions to initial COVID-19 vaccination, risk of mRNA-COVID-19 re-vaccination after an initial reaction, and diagnostic accuracy of COVID-19 vaccine and vaccine excipient testing in predicting reactions. GRADE methods informed rating the certainty of evidence and strength of recommenations. A modified Delphi panel consisting of experts in allergy, anaphylaxis, vaccinology, infectious diseases, emergency medicine, and primary care from Australia, Canada, Europe, Japan, South Africa, the UK, and the US formed the recommendations. We recommend vaccination for persons without COVID-19 vaccine excipient allergy, and re-vaccination after a prior immediate allergic reaction. We suggest against >15-minute post-vaccination observation. We recommend against mRNA vaccine or excipient skin testing to predict outcomes. We suggest re-vaccination of persons with an immediate allergic reaction to the mRNA vaccine or excipients be performed by a person with vaccine allergy expertise, in a properly equipped setting. We suggest against pre-medication, split-dosing, or special precautions because of a comorbid allergic history.

New science, drug regulation, and emergent public health issues: The work of FDA's division of applied regulatory science.

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Division of Applied Regulatory Science (DARS) moves new science into the drug review process and addresses emergent regulatory and public health questions for the Agency. By forming interdisciplinary teams, DARS conducts mission-critical research to provide answers to scientific questions and solutions to regulatory challenges. Staffed by experts across the translational research spectrum, DARS forms synergies by pulling together scientists and experts from diverse backgrounds to collaborate in tackling some of the most complex challenges facing FDA. This includes (but is not limited to) assessing the systemic absorption of sunscreens, evaluating whether certain drugs can convert to carcinogens in people, studying drug interactions with opioids, optimizing opioid antagonist dosing in community settings, removing barriers to biosimilar and generic drug development, and advancing therapeutic development for rare diseases. FDA tasks DARS with wide ranging issues that encompass regulatory science; DARS, in turn, helps the Agency solve these challenges. The impact of DARS research is felt by patients, the pharmaceutical industry, and fellow regulators. This article reviews applied research projects and initiatives led by DARS and conducts a deeper dive into select examples illustrating the impactful work of the Division.

Comparing Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity during the Covid-19 Pandemic Using Patient-Reported Outcome Measures with Face-Toface Clinical Evaluation of Disease Scores Prepandemic

Background/Aims During the COVID-19 pandemic, asynchronous consultations were introduced for patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS). To assess disease activity in the absence of face-to-face clinical review and blood testing, patients submitted patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) via electronic survey forms which were subsequently triaged by clinicians. We compared pre-pandemic clinician-reported scores with intra-pandemic self-reported scores and assessed clinical outcomes including allocation of follow-up and further management/ treatment escalation. Methods Clinician-reported scores were obtained in-person pre-pandemic (defined as 01/01/2019-01/03/2020). Self-reported BASDAI scores were submitted by patients via electronic forms sent out duringpandemic (defined as 01/12/2020-31/03/22). The responses were stored and analysed in a secure database. These scores are analogous to disease activity scores completed by clinicians during outpatient appointments. Score comparison was performed using Wilcoxon Sign Rank testing. We used the need for a follow-up within 3 months as target for those with severe disease. Data analysis was performed in Microsoft Excel and R (version 4.2.1). Results We noted a significantly higher overall level of patient-reported disease activity during the pandemic. In the total cohort of AS patients, the median BASDAI Score collected during-pandemic increased from 5.30 (n=124, range 0-10) compared to 2.80 pre-pandemic (n=590, range 0-12) (p<0.001). The proportion of patients with severe/active disease (defined as BASDAI >4) increased from 36% pre- to 65% during pandemic. In a smaller cohort of 34 patients for whom we had both pre- and during-pandemic scores, all patient parameters worsened during the pandemic. Notably, median BASDAI increased from 2.65 to 5.62 (p<0.0001). Patients with severe AS increased from 10 (29.4%) to 21 (61.8%) intra-pandemic. Follow-up data was available for 12/21 patients with severe AS during-pandemic. 7/12 patients (58%) received a follow-up appointment within one month;11/12 (91%) were seen within three months. On subsequent clinician assessment, only 7 (58%) of patients with self-reported severe AS were felt to have active disease;treatment was escalated for 3 patients. Conclusion There was a significantly higher reported level of AS disease activity during the COVID-19 pandemic, with 62 % of patients qualifying for biologic therapy (BASDAI >4). In a focussed sample, 91% of patients with new severe disease during-pandemic were followed up within the target of 3 months. The BASDAI score is independent from clinical examination and inflammatory markers, and therefore self-reported score should reliably reflect a patient's perception of disease activity. Further work is required to determine the reason for the increased disease activity observed during pandemic, and for the disparity between clinician impression and score results.

Evaluating the Use of Patient Reported Outcome Measures to Assess Intra-Pandemic Psoriatic Arthritis Disease Activity and Comparing Them with Pre-Pandemic Clinical Assessments

Background/Aims In our department, patient reported outcome measures (PROMs), including RAPID-3 and PSAID12, were employed during the COVID-19 pandemic in asynchronous consultations for patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA). We compared pre-pandemic DAS28-CRP with intrapandemic PROMs to assess changes in disease activity since the pandemic. Whilst previous studies have primarily compared PsA PROMs with clinician-assessed scores (e.g. PASDAS), we compare PsA PROMs with clinicians' overall assessment of disease activity;this judgement considers PROMs, serology studies and individual patient feedback. Finally, we assess whether patients with PROMs indicating active disease were followed up appropriately. Methods Clinician-assessed scores were collected between 01/01/2019-01/03/ 2020 (''pre-pandemic''). Between 01/12/2020-31/03/2022 (''intrapandemic''), patient data from electronic surveys were analysed in a secure database for calculation of PROMs. These data, alongside blood results and patient comments, informed clinicians' triage decisions. Clinical outcome data were collected from electronic patient records;>=3 months follow-up appointment allocation was the target for patients with active disease (moderate/high disease activity). Data analysis was performed using r (version 4.2.2). Results In our pre-pandemic cohort (n=393), 79.8% of patients were in remission (per DAS28-CRP). Conversely, the intra-pandemic cohort (n=231) showed remission rates of 14.3% (per PSAID12) and 0% (RAPID-3). Indeed, 33.7% (based on PSAID12) vs 75.8% (RAPID-3) had moderate/ high disease activity. These results were validated in a paired cohort (n=38, score recorded in both windows). Disease activity worsened during the pandemic for 63.2% (PSAID12) and 97.4% (RAPID-3) of patients. PSAID-12 correlated positively with RAPID-3 (r=0.52, p<0.001), especially when RAPID-3 >=6.5 (r=0.75, p<0.001). When comparing PROMs with clinicians' assessment of PsA activity in our paired cohort, PSAID12 and RAPID-3 accurately reflected disease status in 70.6% and 58.8% of patients respectively. 3/9 and 9/27 patients with active disease, based on PSAID12 and RAPID-3 respectively, were seen within three months. Conversely, 7/10 patients who clinicians had deemed to have active disease were seen within three months. Conclusion Despite approximately 80% of patients being in pre-pandemic remission, the majority reported active intra-pandemic PsA. Whilst RAPID-3 skewed patients towards active disease, PSAID12 skewed patients towards remission/low disease activity. PSAID-12 and RAPID- 3 have been previously correlated;however, here we suggest that they could be used interchangeably in patients with high disease activity. PSAID-12 was a better predictor of clinicians' assessment of disease activity, although neither PROM correlated well with >=3 months followup appointment allocation. Although RAPID-3 and PSAID12 helped inform clinicians' decisions, neither alone sufficiently reflects patients' disease states. Remote management is practicable, but future studies should validate these findings across a larger cohort and assess the utility of different PROMs across PsA disease activity categories. Furthermore, multivariate analysis is warranted to ascertain which (combination of) variable(s) (e.g., PROMs, serology results, tender/ swollen joint count) best correlates with clinician judgement.

Inflammatory and mental health sequelae of COVID-19.

The COVID-19 pandemic has caused significant negative consequences to mental health. Increased inflammatory factors and neuropsychiatric symptoms, such as cognitive impairment ("brain fog"), depression, and anxiety are associated with long COVID [post-acute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 infection (PASC), termed neuro-PASC]. The present study sought to examine the role of inflammatory factors as predictors of neuropsychiatric symptom severity in the context of COVID-19. Adults (n = 52) who tested negative or positive for COVID-19 were asked to complete self-report questionnaires and to provide blood samples for multiplex immunoassays. Participants who tested negative for COVID-19 were assessed at baseline and at a follow-up study visit (∼4 weeks later). Individuals without COVID-19 reported significantly lower PHQ-4 scores at the follow-up visit, as compared to baseline (p = 0.03; 95% CI-1.67 to -0.084). Individuals who tested positive for COVID-19 and experienced neuro-PASC had PHQ-4 scores in the moderate range. The majority of people with neuro-PASC reported experiencing brain fog (70% vs. 30%). Those with more severe COVID-19 had significantly higher PHQ-4 scores, as compared to those with mild disease (p = 0.008; 95% CI 1.32 to 7.97). Changes in neuropsychiatric symptom severity were accompanied by alterations in immune factors, particularly monokine induced by gamma interferon (IFN-γ) (MIG, a. k.a. CXCL9). These findings add to the growing evidence supporting the usefulness of circulating MIG levels as a biomarker reflecting IFN-γ production, which is important because individuals with neuro-PASC have elevated IFN-γ responses to internal SARS-CoV-2 proteins.

Coping with Information Loss and the Use of Auxiliary Sources of Data: A Report from the NISS Ingram Olkin Forum Series on Unplanned Clinical Trial Disruptions

While the SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) pandemic has led to an impressive and unprecedented initiation of clinical research, it has also led to considerable disruption of clinical trials in other disease areas, with around 80% of non-COVID-19 trials stopped or interrupted during the pandemic. In many cases the disrupted trials will not have the planned statistical power necessary to yield interpretable results. This paper describes methods to compensate for the information loss arising from trial disruptions by incorporating additional information available from auxiliary data sources. The methods described include the use of auxiliary data on baseline and early outcome data available from the trial itself and frequentist and Bayesian approaches for the incorporation of information from external data sources. The methods are illustrated by application to the analysis of artificial data based on the Primary care pediatrics Learning Activity Nutrition (PLAN) study, a clinical trial assessing a diet and exercise intervention for overweight children, that was affected by the COVID-19 pandemic. We show how all of the methods proposed lead to an increase in precision relative to use of complete case data only. [ FROM AUTHOR] Copyright of Statistics in Biopharmaceutical Research is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full . (Copyright applies to all s.)

Novel Trial Design: CHIEF-HF.

BACKGROUND: The expense of clinical trials mandates new strategies to efficiently generate evidence and test novel therapies. In this context, we designed a decentralized, patient-centered randomized clinical trial leveraging mobile technologies, rather than in-person site visits, to test the efficacy of 12 weeks of canagliflozin for the treatment of heart failure, regardless of ejection fraction or diabetes status, on the reduction of heart failure symptoms. METHODS: One thousand nine hundred patients will be enrolled with a medical record-confirmed diagnosis of heart failure, stratified by reduced (≤40%) or preserved (>40%) ejection fraction and randomized 1:1 to 100 mg daily of canagliflozin or matching placebo. The primary outcome will be the 12-week change in the total symptom score of the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire. Secondary outcomes will be daily step count and other scales of the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire. RESULTS: The trial is currently enrolling, even in the era of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. CONCLUSIONS: CHIEF-HF (Canagliflozin: Impact on Health Status, Quality of Life and Functional Status in Heart Failure) is deploying a novel model of conducting a decentralized, patient-centered, randomized clinical trial for a new indication for canagliflozin to improve the symptoms of patients with heart failure. It can model a new method for more cost-effectively testing the efficacy of treatments using mobile technologies with patient-reported outcomes as the primary clinical end point of the trial. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT04252287.

Human adenovirus lung disease: outbreaks, models of immune-response-driven acute lung injury and pandemic potential.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: An overview of epidemic, human adenovirus (HAdV) lung infections with proposed studies of the viral/host immune response interface to better understand mechanisms of immunopathogenesis, for development of improved responses to a potential HAdV pandemic. RECENT FINDINGS: Emergent HAdV strains 7, 3, 4, 14 are the most common types associated with infection outbreaks. Recent outbreaks have revealed increased community spread, beyond epidemic group settings. The ongoing circulation of these virulent HAdV strains might allow for further HAdV adaptation, with increased HAdV spread and disease severity in the population that could theoretically result in expansion to a pandemic level. SUMMARY: Public health screening has revealed spread of HAdV outbreak strains to the general community. Despite expanded awareness of viral respiratory diseases during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, there has been limited, systematic monitoring of HAdV infection in the population. The shift in clinical laboratories to a focus on molecular diagnostics and away from classical methods of viral characterization has reduced the distribution of outbreak HAdV strains to the research community to study mechanisms of pathogenesis. This change risks reduced development of new preventive and therapeutic strategies that could be needed in the event of more widespread HAdV epidemics.

Class II/III Obesity Prevalence in Residents of US Nursing Homes: Cross-sectional Study and Forecasting 2030 with COVID-19 Perspective.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to better understand Class II/III obesity prevalence trends among older adults residing in nursing homes (NH) nationwide. METHODS: Our retrospective cross-sectional study evaluated Class II/III obesity (BMI ≥35 kg/m²) prevalence among NH residents in two independent national NH cohorts. We used databases from Veterans Administration NHs called Community Living Centers (CLCs) covering 7 years to 2022, and Rhode Island Medicare data covering 20 years ending in 2020. We also performed forecasting regression analysis of obesity trends. RESULTS: While VA CLC resident obesity prevalence was less overall and dipped during the COVID-19 pandemic, obesity prevalence increased in NH residents in both cohorts over the last decade and is predicted to do so through 2030. CONCLUSION: Obesity prevalence in NHs is on the rise. It will be important to understand clinical, functional, and financial implications for NHs, particularly if predictions on increases materialize.

Pirfenidone in fibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonitis: a double-blind, randomised clinical trial of efficacy and safety.

BACKGROUND: Fibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonitis (FHP) is an irreversible lung disease with high morbidity and mortality. We sought to evaluate the safety and effect of pirfenidone on disease progression in such patients. METHODS: We conducted a single-centre, randomised, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial in adults with FHP and disease progression. Patients were assigned in a 2:1 ratio to receive either oral pirfenidone (2403 mg/day) or placebo for 52 weeks. The primary end point was the mean absolute change in the per cent predicted forced vital capacity (FVC%). Secondary end points included progression-free survival (PFS, time to a relative decline ≥10% in FVC and/or diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (DLCO), acute respiratory exacerbation, a decrease of ≥50 m in the 6 min walk distance, increase or introduction of immunosuppressive drugs or death), change in FVC slope and mean DLCO%, hospitalisations, radiological progression of lung fibrosis and safety. RESULTS: After randomising 40 patients, enrolment was interrupted by the COVID-19 pandemic. There was no significant between-group difference in FVC% at week 52 (mean difference -0.76%, 95% CI -6.34 to 4.82). Pirfenidone resulted in a lower rate of decline in the adjusted FVC% at week 26 and improved PFS (HR 0.26, 95% CI 0.12 to 0.60). Results for other secondary end points showed no significant difference between groups. No deaths occurred in the pirfenidone group and one death (respiratory) occurred in the placebo group. There were no treatment-emergent serious adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: The trial was underpowered to detect a difference in the primary end point. Pirfenidone was found to be safe and improved PFS in patients with FHP. TRIAL REGISTRATION MUMBER: NCT02958917.

Clinical Validation of an Alternative Specimen Collection Kit for SARS-CoV-2 Testing at Fox Chase Cancer Center

Background: Supply chain disruptions during the COVID-19 pandemic have affected the availability of components for specimen collection kits to detect SARS-CoV-2. Plastic injection molding offers a rapid and cheap method for mass production of swabs for upper respiratory tract sampling. Local production of virus transport medium increases flexibility to assemble sample collection kits if the medium provides appropriate stability for SARS-CoV-2 detection. Methods: A locally produced virus transport medium and a novel injection molded plastic swab were validated for SARS-CoV-2 detection by reverse-transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction. Both components were compared to standard counterparts using viral reference material and representative patient samples. Results: Clinical testing showed no significant differences between molded and flocked swabs. Commercial and in-house virus transport media provided stable test results for over 40 days of specimen storage and showed no differences in test results using patient samples. Conclusions: This collection kit provides new supply chain options for SARS-CoV-2 testing.

Psychosocial Peer Support to Address Mental Health and Burnout of Health Care Workers Affected by COVID-19: A Qualitative Evaluation

Health care workers in the U.S. are experiencing alarming rates of burnout. Furthermore, the COVID-19 pandemic has worsened this issue. Psychosocial peer-support programs that address general distress and are tailored to health care systems are needed. A Care for Caregivers (CFC) Program was developed at an American metropolitan university hospital and outpatient health care system. The CFC program trains "Peer Caregivers” and managers and has four components: the identification of colleagues in need of support;psychological first aid;linkage to resources;and the promotion of hope among colleagues experiencing demoralization. Qualitative interviews (n = 18) were conducted with Peer Caregivers and Managers participating in the initial piloting of the program. Results suggest that the CFC program shifts the organizational culture, teaches staff skills for recognizing and supporting others in distress, and supports those staff who are already providing these services informally. Findings suggest that staff distress resulted primarily from external factors and secondarily from internal organizational stressors. External stressors were exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic. Although the program has promise for addressing staff burnout, other organizational efforts are needed to simultaneously promote staff wellness. Ultimately, psychosocial peer support programs for health care workers are feasible and potentially impactful, but also require other systemic changes within a health care system to improve and sustain staff well-being.

In vitro antiviral activity of stabilized chlorine dioxide containing oral care products.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the in vitro antiviral activity of oral care products containing stabilized chlorine dioxide toward infectious viruses that harbor in the oral cavity. Specfically, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2), SARS-CoV, human coronavirus (HCoV) 229E, influenza A (H3N2), rhinovirus type 14, adenovirus type 5, and herpes simplex virus (HSV) type 1 and 2 were examined. METHODS: Validated in vitro suspension virucidal assays were used. Test product was mixed with the test virus for 30, 60, or 120 s, neutralized with sodium thiosulfate, serially diluted in dilution medium in a 96-well plate and incubated in a carbon dioxide incubator for 7 days. The 50% Tissue Culture Infectious Dose per milliliter was determined. RESULTS: Two rinses, one oral spray and one fluoride toothpaste showed log reduction of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 ranging from 1.81 to 2.98 and of influenza A from 2.58 to 4.13, respectively, within 30 s of contact time; similar results were obtained at 60 s. Further, the Ultra Sensitive rinse showed 0.19, 0.75, 1.58, 1.75, 2.66, and 3.24 log reduction of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus, human coronavirus 229E, rhinovirus type 14, adenovirus type 5, and herpes simplex virus type 1 and type 2, respectively, within 30 s of contact time. CONCLUSION: Stabilized chlorine dioxide containing CloSYS® oral care products reduced the viral load of multiple viruses within 30 s. The results warrant further investigation for potential in vivo applications.

Associations between cancer history, social distancing behaviors, and loneliness in adults during the COVID-19 pandemic.

BACKGROUND: During the COVID-19 pandemic, enforced social distancing initiatives have highlighted differences in social distancing practices and the resulting loneliness in various populations. The objective of this study was to examine how cancer history and social distancing practices relate to loneliness during COVID-19. METHODS AND FINDINGS: Participants from previous studies (N = 32,989) with permission to be re-contacted were invited to complete a survey online, by phone, or by mail between June and November 2020. Linear and logistic regression models were used to determine the associations between cancer history, social distancing, and loneliness. RESULTS: Among the included participants (n = 5729), the average age was 56.7 years, 35.6% were male, 89.4% were White, and 54.9% had a cancer history (n = 3147). Individuals with a cancer history were more likely to not contact people outside of their household (49.0% vs. 41.9%, p<0.01), but were less likely to feel lonely (35.8% vs. 45.3%, p<0.0001) compared to those without a cancer history. Higher adherence to social distancing behaviors was associated with higher odds of loneliness among individuals with (OR = 1.27, 95% CI: 1.17-1.38) and without a cancer history (OR = 1.15, 95% CI: 1.06-1.25). CONCLUSIONS: Findings from this study can inform efforts to support the mental health of individuals susceptible to loneliness during the COVID-19 pandemic.